Episode description

On a December evening in 2006, a woman calls emergency services and reports that her husband has been stabbed in their home in Ulvila, Finland. She says an unknown intruder carried out the attack while their children slept nearby. What follows is a murder investigation marked by missing evidence, shifting suspicions, multiple trials, and unprecedented legal turns. This episode examines the Ulvila case, the killing of Jukka Lahti, and how the investigation surrounding Anneli Auer became one of the most controversial cases in Finnish legal history.

The Ulvila Murder – The Case of Anneli Auer and the Unsolved Killing of Jukka Lahti

An emergency call on December 1, 2006

At 8:10 p.m. on December 1, 2006, an emergency call is connected to Finnish emergency services.

The caller is a woman.

Her first words are simple and direct:

"My husband has been stabbed."

The woman says that an unknown perpetrator has entered the home, attacked her partner, and disappeared. She states that she has hidden with the children, who are asleep, while her husband lies injured in the bedroom.

She says she is afraid the attacker may still be inside the house and that she does not dare approach the bedroom.

Police and ambulance services are dispatched immediately.

The caller is later identified as Anneli Auer.

Ulvila – a quiet residential town

The incident takes place in Ulvila, a small municipality in western Finland, just outside the city of Pori.

Ulvila is a quiet residential area with detached houses, calm streets, and little serious crime. Neighbors recognize each other's cars and notice immediately when something deviates from the ordinary.

Emergency sirens and flashing blue lights are not part of everyday life.

The family

Anneli Auer is 31 years old at the time. She lives in the house with her partner, Jukka S. Lahti, who is 43 years old.

The couple has three children together, aged five, three, and two.

Police arrive at the scene

Police officers are the first to arrive at the house shortly after the emergency call. They enter the residence and proceed directly to the bedroom.

Jukka Lahti is found lying in the bed.

He has extensive incised wounds to the neck. There is a large amount of blood in and around the bed. The officers immediately determine that he shows no signs of life. The injuries are assessed as incompatible with survival.

No life-saving measures are initiated.

Ambulance personnel arrive shortly afterward and confirm the death. Jukka Lahti is declared deceased in the home.

Three small children have lost their father.

The crime scene

The forensic investigation is concentrated entirely on the bedroom.

Jukka Lahti is lying on his back in the bed. Blood is present on the bedding, the mattress, and in the immediate area around the bed. The blood pattern is limited to the bed and its surroundings.

There are no signs of a struggle.

No furniture is overturned. No objects are broken. There are no indications that the body was moved after the injuries were inflicted.

No blood traces are found in the hallway, kitchen, living room, or other parts of the house. No bloody footprints are documented.

There are no signs of forced entry. Doors and windows show no pry marks. No locks are damaged. No broken glass is found.

No murder weapon is recovered. The weapon used to kill Jukka Lahti is never found.

No fingerprints or DNA traces are secured that can be linked to an unknown external perpetrator.

Forensic medical findings

The forensic medical examination determines that Jukka Lahti died from sharp force trauma to the neck.

The injuries consist of deep incised wounds affecting soft tissues, blood vessels, and the airway. Death occurred rapidly due to extensive bleeding.

There are no documented defensive injuries to the hands or forearms. There are no signs that the victim attempted to protect himself or struggled with an attacker.

The injuries are assessed as having been inflicted while Jukka Lahti was lying in bed.

The examination cannot determine what specific object was used. The weapon remains unknown.

Anneli Auer's initial statement

Anneli Auer is questioned shortly after the death is confirmed.

She states that she heard noises coming from the bedroom, went to investigate, and saw an unfamiliar man attacking Jukka Lahti.

She says she became frightened, took the children, and withdrew. She did not approach the bed and did not intervene because she feared the perpetrator was still in the house.

She states that the man disappeared and that she did not see where he went.

She says she did not see a weapon and cannot identify the man beyond stating that he was unknown to her.

She then called emergency services.

Early investigation focus

Based on Anneli Auer's statement, the investigation initially focuses on an unknown perpetrator.

Police search the area, question neighbors, and examine possible escape routes. No witnesses report seeing an unfamiliar person in the area.

At the same time, the technical picture becomes clear:

• No signs of forced entry

• No technical traces of an external perpetrator

• No defensive injuries

• A crime scene limited to the bed

These factors are documented and analyzed.

Shift in focus

As days pass, no evidence emerges to support the presence of an unknown attacker.

Anneli Auer is the only adult confirmed to have been present in the house at the time of the murder.

The investigation expands to include close relations, a routine step in homicide investigations when external evidence is lacking.

Anneli Auer becomes the focus of more extensive questioning.

Eventually, she is informed that she is suspected of murder.

She denies the crime and maintains her account of an unknown perpetrator.

Arrest and trial

Anneli Auer is detained and later charged with murder.

The prosecution's case is based on the absence of evidence supporting an external perpetrator, the forensic findings, and the fact that she was present in the home.

There is no confession.
No murder weapon.
No technical evidence directly linking her to the act.

In district court, Anneli Auer is convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Acquittal on appeal

Anneli Auer appeals the verdict.

The court of appeal conducts a full re-evaluation of the evidence. It finds that there is no direct evidence linking her to the killing and that the prosecution's case is based on assumptions rather than proof beyond reasonable doubt.

The conviction is overturned.

Anneli Auer is acquitted and released after more than three years in custody.

An unprecedented legal turn

Years later, Anneli Auer is arrested again for the same murder.

The prosecution claims new evidence has emerged, consisting mainly of new expert interpretations of existing forensic material.

There is no new physical evidence.
No new witnesses.
No confession.

She is tried again — and acquitted again.

False reporting and later cases

Although acquitted of murder, Anneli Auer is later convicted of providing false information and defamation related to her statements about an unknown perpetrator. She receives a suspended sentence and a fine.

Separately, she is charged with sexual offenses against her children, convicted in district court, and later fully acquitted on appeal due to serious deficiencies in the investigation.

An unsolved murder

The murder of Jukka Lahti remains unsolved.

No perpetrator has been identified.
No weapon has been found.
No conclusive answers exist.

The case of Ulvila stands as one of the most controversial and legally complex criminal cases in Finnish history.

YOUTUBE

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY9UhmQnhrD-R_OOhmvUhWQ

PODCAST

https://shows.acast.com/true-crime-24-english